Post-Gazette
Candidates falsely claim backing
Saturday, May 16, 2009
By James O'Toole, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Two Pittsburgh city council candidates are circulating literature that incorrectly suggests that they have been endorsed by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
John Robinson Block, the co-publisher and editor-in-chief of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, denounced the tactics of both campaigns.
"This is a deliberate, despicable campaign tactic and dishonorable in every way," Mr. Block said.
In the hotly-contested race for the open seat in City Council District 4, Patrick Reilly is distributing a flier headlined, "Endorsed Democrat Patrick Reilly."
That is true, as far as it goes. Mr. Reilly is the endorsed candidate of the Allegheny County Democratic Party's committee members in the South Hills district.
But just beneath that notation is the logo of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, and the date of the paper's endorsement editorial in the race. In that editorial, the paper's editorial board endorsed another candidate in the race, Natalia Rudiak, calling her "progressive, hard-working and temperamentally ready for the rigors of the office," and urging voters to support her as "the best choice hands down."
But the flier, which was distributed to about 2,500 voters according to the campaign's estimate, includes the quote, under the Post-Gazette logo, "Patrick Reilly is energetic, smart, and understands the values of networking."
That quote is accurate, but it was mentioned only in passing on the way to the editorial's board's statement of support for Mr. Reilly's opponent.
Mr. Reilly said last night that the campaign had not intended to convey a false impression with the flier. To correct any improper inference, however, he said the campaign was preparing a corrective piece of literature, to be mailed to the same voter list this morning. He said it would state that Mr. Reilly was not endorsed by the paper.
Mayor Luke Ravenstahl got into the act, but perhaps not as overtly as in Mr. Reilly's flier. A mass mailing that went out this week boasted of the mayor's accomplishments and directly beneath it was the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette masthead. The mailing also carried a Post-Gazette headline from a story in November that read, "City weathering financial storm."
But in the Democratic primary, the Post-Gazette endorsed Mr. Ravenstahl's opponent, Patrick Dowd.
The incident with Mr. Reilly was reminiscent of a tactic in an adjoining district, in which Councilwoman Theresa Smith printed an old editorial, from February, in which the Post-Gazette congratulated her for her victory in a special election, and welcomed her to council.
The format of Ms. Smith's campaign literature would lead many voters to the inference that she had been endorsed by the editorial board in this race. In fact, in the special election as in Tuesday's primary, the editorial board had endorsed her opponent, Georgia Blotzer.
In a conversation with Tom Waseleski, the paper's editorial page editor, Ms. Smith defended her campaign literature, pointing to the fact that it had quoted the February editorial in full. Mr. Waseleski dismissed her contention, noting that a reasonable person, reading the campaign flier, would be left with the incorrect impression that Ms. Smith had won the paper's endorsement.
For connoisseurs of election gamesmanship, there was a double irony in the Reilly literature in that it featured twin photographs of Mr. Reilly and Pittsburgh Mayor Luke Ravenstahl and pointed out, correctly, that they had both been endorsed by the Democratic committee.
"On Tuesday, May 19th, please vote for the team that will get it done," it stated under the two pictures. But in this primary, it takes a broad definition of "team" to include both Mr. Reilly and the mayor. Mr. Ravenstahl is supporting yet another candidate in the 4th District, Anthony Coghill.
Jack Kelly Sunday
18 hours ago

13 comments:
...and false Smith flier and false Ravenstahl flier...right?
The post also called out a false piece by Luke......why don't you make that your headline?
""This is a deliberate, despicable campaign tactic and dishonorable in every way,"
By boldfacing that portion of the article you are registering your agreement not only for Reilly's dirty trick but also for Smith's, correct?
And, you notice, Reilly is the only one with the minimal integrity to recognize that he is caught and apologize for lying to people.
Im glad the Post Gazette called out Mr Reilly, especially since the Allegheny County Dem Committee endorsemnt was a joke because he and Mr Wagner cheated!! HAHA! O hey Matt, any word on that Brandon Dukes kid that wrote that wonderful letter in the PPG endorsing Coghill?? He sounds like he is HOTT and I am definitely NOT a guy, just a super hot horny girl who has a thing for excellent writing!!
Smith's flier list her endorsements and the P-G is not listed. How is that misleading? If you actually read the flier, it starts off with "we (the P-G) did not endorse Mrs. Smith. I think this is a stretch.
I posted this on Pittsburgh Coment,but I doubt it will be posted because Blotzer and her massage therapist Braum are friends:
Blotzer's Campaign literature in the mail states DEMOCRAT in Bold letters at the top of her flyer!
She is not the endorsed Democrat.
The flyer may confuse individuals
who do not know Smith is the Endorsed Democrat. So, Blotzer
is using false advertisement for her campaign. She keeps changing parties who she represents, the only party she will be a leader is if she holds her own tupperware party!
Uh, duh! Blotzer is a Democrat running in a Democratic primary -- nothing deceptive there.
Blotzer also has this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hGDCjAb0JM for a campaign manager, so what can you say? He was probably high when he came up with that
I think the Post Gazette should do an investigative report on how Reilly got the endorsement in the first place. That's a scam in itself.
Vote for Anthony Coghill.
Has anyone else noticed how quiet things are about the Blotzer fiasco with the slate cards?
So, Matt H.
Coghill loses, Luke wins..
Makes you winner.
monk
For the record, my only problem with the "City of Pittsburgh REAL DEMOCRATS" slate cards was that no legitimate, self-respecting organization would ever have endorsed Don Walko for Court of Common Pleas, for example.
Post a Comment