Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Getting to know Joe Luvara

Joe Luvara is running for a seat on the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas.

Joe Luvara campaign site

1. Why are you running for office?

I am running to be public servant dedicated to protecting the values of Mr. Rogers so that for the next generations, Allegheny County will remain a neighborhood that he professes, and that when the man in the cardigan sweater and tennis shoes says this to the children on the only international television show filmed in Pittsburgh, that those values of fairness, even play, and the protection and preservation of our values, remains.

2. What would you like to see accomplished while you are in office?

Addressing the ideas that we need in order to be a leader in the eliminating criminal activity of young people, who generally lack education and supervision. If this generation continues to have felony convictions, they cannot find employment. Nobody will hire them. They will therefore return to crime. We need to find a system that allows us to treat them and to give them training in life skills. Also, there are many persons who are involved in drugs and have mental health problems. Prison is not the answer. The answer is to expand drug court and mental health court and to gain alternatives for these persons so that they can be functional. lastly, this county that lead the way in cleaning air and addressing urban renewal, needs to be the leader that addresses the foreclosure problem, protects people from fraud (especially the elderly).

3. Which federal court decision do you think has most impacted society? How and why?

Lochner. This is the case that says that people should be free to contract. This case is used to limit the rights of ordinary persons, in FAVOR OF THE RICH AND POWERFUL. This is the excuse for attacking unions, people's pensions, etc.

4. How much freedom do you think a judicial candidate should have to express his views?

I would prefer not to comment.

5. Do you think judges should be elected by the people or appointed by a commission?

Elected.

6. Do you believe the composition of juries adequately and fairly reflects society at large? Why or why not? If not, what can we do to change this?

There is always room for improvement in anything. On balance, my experience is that juries tend to take their assignments seriously and that they do a good job in making decisions.

7. What do you perceive as the greatest obstacles to justice?

The attitude of looking for simple answers to complex problems and the judiciary’s dilemma of wanting to look for favorable public opinion polls. Being a judge is difficult. Part of the freedom needed in order to be a judge is required so that when making of difficult decisions, the decisions are not based on a challenge to his or her popularity.

8. Do you feel the war on drugs has been effective or ineffective?

We need to do better! We need to protect our children, interdict the traffic and we need economic development, including education, in order to stop the incentive. We need to be a court that understands the value of hope, as well as the value of punishment.

9. Who are your judicial role models? Why?

Louis Brandies. He had courage to challenge the unfair, had the ability to explain himself in a brief way, and he could reason past the problem in order to create solutions. He best expressed the idea of the right to privacy, which its protection should be one of the greatest challenges to the moral fiber of our future. In other words, many are good at telling what is wrong with a situation, while he was able to create positive change that made life find greater order. Justice Brandies was the latter.

10. What would make you a good Judge?

I am a private practitioner and I have been independent of the large firm mentality and the government points of view. The rights of ordinary persons are what I have looked to protect. Many times, I have been acting in a pro bono role because it is the right thing to do, because the ordinary people need fairness. They need an even playing field. Further, because I have been part of the Bloomfield community, being an owner of an Italian food store with my family, I believe that I have learned humility and I have learned respect for the needs of the neighborhood. This means that I have first hand knowledge of both the value of a neighborhood and the challenges that it takes in order to preserve it. To be a judge, you need first hand knowledge. You need wisdom from that knowledge. Then you need the courage and constitution to follow through, especially when it means protecting ordinary people. I know that I have the values to do this.

Lastly, I have been blessed with an 18 month-old foster child. Her name is Olivia. I am 53 and I never had children. Now, I am motivated in a very special way, that only a parent can be motivated, in order to do more. I want Olivia and all of the Olivia’s in this County to be able to tell their children that Allegheny is still the land of the man in the cardigan sweater, tennis shoes and that reassures the rest of this country that fairness is not weakness. It is the way that you make it a “beautiful day in the neighborhood.”

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

The Allegheny County Bar Association rated 15 candidates for Common Pleas Court judgeships...only 2 were rated "unqualified"...Mr. Luvara was one of the two.

Anonymous said...

Ouch.

Anonymous said...

uhhh...Lochner is bad law. See, e.g., Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, 248 U.S. 483 (1955). It has no impact on today's legal landscape. A lawyer that cited it, even (as the candidate puts it) "IN FAVOR OF THE RICH AND POWERFUL" would be laughed out of court. Mr. Luvara seems like a nice guy, and seems to have ethics in line with my own, but I simply can't see how it would be a good idea to elect someone to the bench that can't Shepardize a case, especially one so famously overruled as Lochner v. New York.

Also, it's Brandeis.

charles said...

One of the key questions they asked was whether he would divest himself of any association with his family's business (the Groceria Italiana in Bloomfield behind the Pleasure Bar on Liberty) and Joe said absolutely not. Remember, they didn't ask if he would recuse himself from cases associated with the store (of course he would). But where is it written that you have to give up a family business to run for office? Obviously, the almighty ACBA is as usual full of Sh*t.

Anonymous said...

I could not agree with you more. It is more political than trying to get the endorsement. Thats why people should say a LOUD NO to "merit selection" when the so called "good government" folks try and raise the issue.
go bengal & zappala-peck

Anonymous said...

Bengal and Zappala-Peck are horrible choices.

Go Susan!

Anonymous said...

The ACBA ratings run, in descending order, from "highly recommended" to "recommended" to "not recommended at this time" to "unqualified"...Mr. Luvara earned the lowest rating....Of course no one is bound by these ratings but they do provide a useful guide for voters who would not be familiar with the credentials and experience of judicial candidates but who still want to elect qualified judges.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Bengal and Zappala-Peck are horrible choices.

Go Susan!

May 08, 2009
Susan???

Anonymous said...

Susan is Susan DiLucente. I think she'd make a good CP Court Judge. Bengel would also. As to Zappala-Peck....maybe.

Anonymous said...

FYI: Bengel and Zappala-Peck were "not recommended at this time" by the ACBA Judiciary Committee, while DiLucente was "recommended."

Anonymous said...

I'm going with Ignelzi, Williams, McGough and Susan...all are solid choices.

Anonymous said...

Go Zappala-Peck & Bengel

Anonymous said...

Time for predictions....I think any one of 8 or 9 can win..If money wins elections, the winners are Ignelzi, Zappala, Bengel, DiLucente, and Klein. I can live with voting for McGough & Salderi- Bengel and no one else.

But my prediction in no particular order...Ignelzi, J. Williams, Salderi-Bengel, Zappala, and DiLucente....I absolutely will be wrong....anyone else want to venture a guess?